The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I'm afraid our priorities are different. Omega
: can ramp up in-house production and produce
: these movements again to please movement
: aficionados, raise the price considerably
: because of the higher unit price, and lose
: sales overall because of higher prices.
: Omega is in the business of making money.
.....and they make their own movements.
my original remarks re Omega not making their own movements whilst Rolex still do were to do with percieved quality and craftmanship. Omega seem to be ramping up the prices anyway and moving the brand upmarket with more expensive models and very exclusive limited editions, so why not do the job properly and make their own movements.
as someone else said today, the difference in cost wouldnt be more than $400 between an ETA and an Omega movement ?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |