The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Just one--?
For me, I think "the" watch is more of a process than any given model. I like looking, researching, going after, holding for a while, and then starting again w/ it. I enjoy that too much to allow myself to be satisifed w/ any single time piece.
For me, however, this means something between 4 watches, always:
1) The watch you do want.
2) The watch you did want.
3) The watch you should want.
4) And the watch you inevitably go back to.
The watch I think I do want is the Planet Ocean 42mm model 2209.50, orange bezel, on bracelet. When I was young, I was far too conservative, worried far too much about fitting in. Today, it stretches me a bit, and my clients (folks going through divorce) will have something soothing to look at when we meet.
The watch I did want was the first Omega Bond, the 2541.80 quartz. Had it, then a used 2531.80, then the new one I now own. I'll never part w/ it, because it was my original target. But it was wrong for Bond and wrong for me.
The watch I should want is whatever the next James Bond 007 watch will be. "Should," meaning that my watch buying is so largely influenced by this affiliation that I know I'll be more inclined to go w/ what some wordrobe hack picked out via product placement deal than what I'm attracted to.
(But, who knows: Some of you helped talk me down from the 2537.80, so there may be hope.)
The watch I inevitably go back to is the Omega Seamaster 2254.50, which I am wearing as type. Still tempted to put it on the Bond bracelet (1503-825). I'm about to wrap up Day #78 of her precision accuracy audit (you know, putting actual numbers to the so-called "settling in period"), so maybe it's just the time I've put in (no pun intended).
It's usually the 2254.50 that I include w/ my Posts, as below. Sort of like that "bad boy" look on the leather biker jacket....
Good question. Good responses.
Link to my Omega Seamaster 2252.50 review: For a 21st Century Goldfinger
Link to my Omega Seamaster 2254.50 review: Should'a been Bond's Omega
Link to my Omega Seamaster 2255.80 review: "The Electric Blue"
Link to my Omega Seamaster 2531.80 review: Bond's second Omega
Link to my Omega Seamaster 2541.80 review: Actually-- Bond's first Omega
Link to my Omega Seamaster 2561.80 review: Mid-sized version of 2541.80
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |