zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

A time line perspective

In Response To: What if it's not the 4832.51.31 DeVille? *PIC* ()

Just want to mention that Omegas has been Associating the Deville, and Railmaster for that matter, with James Bond and Pierce Brosnan for over 3 years not. My 2005 Omega catalog, which was printed in 2004 shows James (Pierce) on one page flanked by the Deville Power Resreve on the opposite page. My 2004 catalog, which was printed in 2003, shows Pierce opposite the Railmaster touting it as "Pierce Brosnan's Choice".

So, why are we now concerned about the current inferences that the Deville may be the new Bond watch? It's fun to speculate but why all the fuss? I think Omega owners either know, (or can find out easily if they're interested) the difference between the watces Bond wore in the films and Omega's marketing hype. Copy that?
Image hosting by Photobucket