The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Omega Advertisements in the US

: Hi

: Bond is just pure marketing. They should tather
: make advertisement in the quality of their
: movement than on watches worn in movies.
: Movies doesn't tell you how good is a
: watch.In the past Omega always used the
: quality of its movements as an argument, not
: really the case today. 2006 Big Year for
: Omega? It will be a big year only if Omega
: solves the problems on the 33xx in a
: definitive manner and probably takes in
: consideration that the after sales service
: in their subsidiary in USA has to be greatly
: improved. Rolex has two great service
: centres in USA, the beverely hills and the
: new york service centres, not the case of
: Omega who had failed mediocrily with
: Lancatser and I don't know how is the
: successor of Omega Lancaster doing in terms
: of service. At last but not least, Omega USA
: shouldn't give complicated watches to young
: watchmakers who are most of the time n00bs
: who hasn't got enough experience for
: repairing comlplicated movements.Marketing
: doesn't tell you how good is a watch, the
: movement makes the whole difference.

I agree with you, Georges, in that I do want to see Omega make a better effort to improve their customer service (especially here in the US where it has a poor reputation). I also want to see them continue to work hard to improve the quality of their movements, as they have done by adding the co-axial escapement and using the Piguet column wheel chrono. I'm not saying this movement is 100% reliable, but I am saying that it has the capability of being Omega's top movement once all of the bugs are totally gone.

The one thing I must say regarding marketing is that Rolex has done it right, and that's why people here in the US and worldwide are so willing to pay top dollar for a Rolex watch. Omega NEEDS to improve on their marketing strategy if they are going to compete at the same level as Rolex. If the Bond association helps them, I don't see anything wrong with that. True, what's on Bond's wrist may have NOTHING to do with the quality of the movement inside the watch he's wearing, but at least it gives Omega some badly needed exposure in the marketplace.

Just my 2 cents....

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE