The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Great combo.Although I would prefer the swiss
: excellence of a Sig P210 9mm to go with such
: a fine swiss timepiece,the 1911 45acp wins
: in the practicality department.
: The Leica is the more useless to me from the
: cost basis position as they are high dollar
: low feature item.Canon will do,but that is
: me.
I agree that Sigs are beautifully engineered and built, just like an Omega. I would argue that the Leica is the camera counterpart to an Omega as its price point is similar and they can be purchased used reasonably. I have Canon FD, EOS and DSLR equipment and while dependable and well-engineered, do not have the quality feel of a Leica M.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |