The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Beware, "new" style deployant clasp for dive strap

The new style butterfly deployant clasp for SMPs with rubber straps, is a great concept,but has some faults in it's execution.I have just purchased one from my AD and am quite disappointed.The problems are:1.the side that closes 1st,I'll call side A,is not held down fully either by the stud that it clicks down on,or by side B,which then closes down on top of side A. B is held in place by a two spring loaded buttons in a similar fashion to the standard SMP deployant clasp.The stud on side A has a slot that can be pried open to adjust it's tension,but it will still not hold side A flush.Side A will always be higher than side B by approx. the thickness of the metal.This does not look good and can snag on things.Problem 2.The double button spring catch on side B looks like it is much stronger than the standard SMP catch but it is flawed.On similar clasps,Oris for example,the buttons are secured by capturing the spring with a bent tab of metal,very secure.My Omega catch failed in only 6 days when one of the two TINY set screws (hidden under the catch),came out.These set screws, which secure the springs, are not contained in any way and cannot be seen without disasembly.Problem 3,both straps are connected to the length adjustment mechanism portion of the clasp with spring bars.If the owner has a small wrist these adjusters will allow the band to separate from the clasp at an angle great enough to be equal to the thickness of the band.This is very unsightly,and will allow the clasp to easily snag on things.This could be corrected by adding a rubber spacer over the lobes on the adjuster ,which I have done,or the lobes could be re-designed to prevent this.I can use locktite,spacers and other rigged methods to partially correct the latter two problems, but for $150. I expect a better executed design. I could return the clasp,however,I have shortened my bands to fit and they will not now work with my other clasp.Repacement cost for the band alone is $169.This has been an expensive experiment. David C.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE