| Informational Websites | ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox | OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website | Zowie -- Omega information |
| Discussion Forums | ChronoMaddox Forum | Heuer Forum | Omega Forum |
| Counterfeit Watchers | ChronoTools Forum | ChronoTrader Forum |
|
|
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
| For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: The speedmaster pro is fitted with the very
: trusted lemania 1873 based calibre so no
: worries, I wouldn't submit a 1120 or 2500 to
: violent shocks because those are thin
: movements and not made to take very severe
: or harsh abuse as compared to their
: predecessors which were inhouse or as
: compared to rolex movements.I wouldn't
: recommend to play golf or tennis with a
: coaxial the winding system wouldn't like it.
Hmmm..... May I ask what you mean by "thin"??? Is this the thickness of the movement, and could you give me some examples of the 'thinness' of the 2500 and speedmaster lemania 1873???
Thank you again.
| Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |