The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: More specific....
In Response To: Re: More specific.... ()

: Hmmm..... May I ask what you mean by
: "thin"??? Is this the thickness of
: the movement, and could you give me some
: examples of the 'thinness' of the 2500 and
: speedmaster lemania 1873???

: Thank you again.
OK, here we go:
cal 2500:
height: 3.9mm
diameter 25.6mm for 35mm watches and 28.6mm for 38 mm 42mm watches

cal lemania 1873
height: 6.87mm
diameter: 27mm

I can even give you the characteristsic of for example two older inhouse movements
cal 1010
height: 4.25mm
diameter: 27.9mm

cal 55x/56x/75x
height: 4.5mm/5.55mm/5.68mm
diameter:27.9mm

Just by looking these two characteristic it is enough too judge about how thin is the eta based calibre. Of course there are thinner movements, but that is not the point here, the 2892-2 was never really tested in very harsh repeated conditions, I have never heard of that. Plus its ball mounted rotor isn't the best winding system as compared to what Omega used before, the jeweled pivot rotor. Someone posted awhile ago a report of an aquaterra used in the sahara, it told more of the resistance of the whole watch than of the movement unlike playing golf or tennis with the watch or other activities/sports including quick and sometimes violent movements.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE