The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Just how much of an improvement is the Co-Ax really compared to the 1120? I own two Omegas, an AT and an Electric Blue SMP. I prefer the SMP and funnily enough,it is more accurate on the wrist on a day-to-day basis.
According to some technical articles I've read on the Co-Ax, it is complex and one wonders about long-time reliability and whether the ten year service interval will in fact be possible.
Price is another matter: the Co-Ax almost doubles the price of any previously 1120 powered model.
I have a feeling that if Omega persist with the plan to switch to the Co-Ax across the board for the SMP (apparently a dead cert) they are going to lose customers because the excellent value for money in a yet still superior watch factor will be lost, something for which the brand has become famous for and has attracted many loyal supporters.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |