The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: some thaughts
In Response To: some thaughts ()

: Omega needs to start to be manufacture again
: and drop completely the eta 2892a2 as base
: movement and come back to the 1010, 1020 and
: 1030 series
: of its inhouse 28800 bph calibres that never
: knew a single problem. The ball rotor system
: is not the most robust rotor system, the
: most robust rotor winding system is the
: jeweled pivot system found on rolexes and on
: older omegas with inhouse movements.

Based on the problems I've had, I can honestly say that the worst problems were with the 2627 co-axial power reserve caliber in my DeVille. My 1120 problems weren't nearly as severe. By the time I had sent the DeVille in for service I was honestly convinced I was never going to get it started again. I wound it and shook it for what seemed like an eternity before the second hand finally started to move.

This has me wondering whether the problem lies in the base ETA 2892-A2 movement or in the modifications made to them to form whatever Omega calibers they ultimately become. If the problem were solely with the 2892-A2, I'd expect to see a lot of the same problems with watches from other manufacturers like Breitling, TAG, etc. who also use this movement. The 2892-A2 is so ubiqitous in the watch world that I would think any inherent problems with it would have been uncovered and corrected by now. It's puzzling to say the least.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE