The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Hi Jeff,
Yeah, I'm one of those people who immediately identify the piepan model with the Constellation marque. I'm really not excited about the newer Constellations...my personal opinion, but the case and bracelet design leaves me cold.
My purely personal opinions aside, the 1120 inside the modern Connie is a terrific movement...I have a Bond Seamaster Pro with that inside, and it is generally -2 sec./day in daily wear. Seeing a modern Connie in person convinced me that it is a solid, well-made watch, but I still wasn't won over by the look of it.
I own a 1966 SS piepan Constellation with the cal. 564 that I think is a work of art. The Deville line seems to really echo the vintage Constellation styling, and if I were to get a new Omega dress watch, I'd probably look at that line first.
Anyway, congratulations and wear it in good health!
Best regards,
Jim
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |