The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Having gotten a number of comments now on my 14060M no-date Sub being a "truer to its roots" Rolex, I must confess to having never thought of anything other than the bubble-dates as the genuine article.
It also took a bit of getting used to after my full-sized 2254.50 Seamaster. Funny how we come to have opinions about what a brand or class of watch "should" be, eh? My own "odd" is that the mid-sized Seamasters aren't "Omega," despite the fact that I don't have the same feeling about a virtually similarly sized Rolex.
The emotional side of what we're into here, I guess. And a part I enjoy every bit as much as any other (eg, see my "intimacy via winding crown" reply to Joey, above)!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |