The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I agree. It is your money and you have a right to certain expectations particularly at certain price levels. I think most people would agree that the expectations for a $50 Casio or $75 Timex would be lower than for a $2000 Omega. Higher expectations are presumably why one is willing to part with more money...it is for quality. (Ironically two of my best performing, closest to "perfection" and toughest watches were a Casio and a Luminox).
So Tibor, to answer your question...I believe at this price level you have a right to a "dust free" watch if that is important to you (it would definitely bother me too). Besides, Omega would want you to be satisfied...there is no worse advertisement that an unhappy customer!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |