The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: I would not
In Response To: I would not ()

: keep the chronograph second hand running 24/7,
: because it simply makes the chronograph
: portion of the movement working harder.

: On paper, it should be ok. But think about it,
: chronograph is more complicated than the
: chronometer (time keeping module). The
: chronometer is basically an escapement
: mechanism plus a gear train driven by the
: mainspring. while the chronograph is
: composed of levers, column wheels (in this
: case) etc. The escapement has well designed
: anti-shock mechanism.

: In real life, the watch will experience
: unavoidable banging around. If the shock is
: to cause damage, the running chronograph
: would be easier than the chronometer part to
: get damaged. (IMHO).

What you're saying does indeed make sense, most notably that if the watch were to experience a blow the chronograph function could experience some damage. However, this would be the case whether the chrono is running or not, as a servere bump or shock could certainly knock a part out of alignment, running or at rest.

I don't own many chronographs becuase I don't need to time things often, but in the case of the Broad Arrow, I think its chrono feature should be used as often as possible while the watch is still under warranty to test for the reported problems with the series 33xx movement.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE