The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

2500B vs. 2500C
In Response To: Re: Just an update ()

: What's the difference between the 2500B and
: 2500C
: movement? I'm curious because I own an AT as
: well.

2500B beats at 28,800 beats per hour, or 8 beats per second (8 x 60 x 60 = 28,800). 2500C beats at 25,200 beats per hour, or 7 beats per second. Also, 2500C has a modified lift angle which makes production easier and also more closely aligns with the recommendations of George Daniels (the watchmaker who created the co-axial escapement). In fact, Mr. Daniels also recommended the lower beat rate in 2500C. That's why I suspect that Omega will stop at the C version, since this is also the version in every Planet Ocean model ever produced.

2500C has a longer power reserve (about 3.5 hours longer) than 2500B since it is beating more slowly. The watch also isn't working as hard since it is beating more slowly, so 2500C could potentially see greater longevity (this obviously has not been studied yet, since 2500C is far too new).

One thing of interest about these two movements - many people think of a "sweeping second hand" as being in constant motion. In fact, in the case of 2500B, you actually see 8 tiny jumps per second (each one corresponding to one of the "beats", or vibrations, of the rotor). The same is true of caliber 1120 in the Seamasters, since this watch has the same beat rate. These tiny jumps create the illusion of constant motion to the untrained eye.

By comparison, 2500C has 7 tiny jumps per second to create its sweeping second hand motion, since it beats at 7 vibrations per second.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE