![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Hi,
Im planning on buying a Seamaster next weekend, I had always planned on buying the black automatic but now I am considering the Planet Ocean
My main concern is the movement - this will be my first omega and I want to ensure I make the right decision
As I understand it, the Coax movement would require less maintainance in the long term whereas the "older" movement is tried and tested. I read in a couple of recent threads that there are/ have been problems with the Coax movement
I guess my questions are
- Did problems with the "older" movement lead Omega to introduce the Coax movement? Or is the new movement merely an innovation that allows Omega to differentiate themselves from other brands?
- Is the Coax movement "better"
- What are the problems that have been found with the Coax movement?
- Any other advice greatly appreciated
Many Thanks
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |