The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Bababnin has his point of view, but many calibers of rolex despite they are age are clearly superior to the ball rotor system because they pass decades without being serviced and keep very good times. An eta 2892-a2 or an eta 2824 doesn't offer the same resistance to shock than a rolex or an older inhouse Omega movement that are far better built,have better accuracy and far better reliability over the long run. Eta is eta a middle of the range manufacture. Patek uses the jeweled pivot system and there are some very high brands who use it as well, many brands in the past used that system instead of the ball rotor.
A rolex 3035 or a cal 1012 will is far better than an eta in terms of accuracy, reliability and finish.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |