The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
First Omega isn't a manufacture anymore but an assembleur. The Omega eta based calibres are very far to meet the quality of their inhouse predecessors. You win more money by selling a vintage Omega in pristine condition than by buying an eta based powered Omega.Eta movements are very rarely equalling quality of inhouse movements. Eta are no match to Rolex movements and older Omega vintage inhouse movements even modified they have not the same level of durability, reliability and over the long run accuracy.Omega under hayek is not a manufacture and the policy of hayek has not helped Omega. Rolex was conservative and didn't have problems with its movement unlike the 1120 and unlike Omega who produced 3 versions of the 2500, Rolex never knew a single problem with its caliber 3135. Etas are as common as chevrolets, nothing special even modified a chevy remains a chevy.
Being a manufacture makes the difference.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |