The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

I Completely Disagree...
In Response To: You want the reason??? ()

: The honest answer to your question is Rolex has
: far more value than Omega! Rolex has
: superior design ( classic) that is why it is
: the most copied (fakes) watch worlwide.

Classic design, yes. Superior? Absolutely not. The oyster bracelet is a joke compared to Omega bracelets, and even most Rolex owners who actually ARE watch enthusiasts will admit this. The cyclops date magnifier is hated by as many people as those that like it. Omegas designs look far more modern than anything Rolex makes.

: Omega can never beat Rolex even if they get all
: the Hollywood stars even get James Bond to
: endorse their product. Rolex will still beat
: them. 'ROLEX HAS THE REPUTATION OF BEING THE
: BEST IN THE WORLD' Those people who buy
: Omega are those people who want second best,
: who clearly want a Rolex, but cannot afford
: one just yet!

Give me a break!!! I owned a Sea Dweller and sold it because I liked the look and feel of my Bond SMP better. To imply that we are "settling" for an Omega is ludicrous. Some of us just realize that Rolex is grossly overpriced and don't want to waste our money on a "status symbol". We want the best value for the money, and Omega is the clear winner here.

: This may be an Omega forum, but I'm just being
: honest. Don't et me wrong, I had bought an
: Omega Seamaster 2531.80 watch, but once I
: had the money tospend, I replaced it right
: away with A Rolex Sub which is the original
: watch Of 007!

I'm being honest, too. However, it does get sickening when people imply that those of us who buy Omega are "too poor" to afford a Rolex. I CHOOSE not to buy a Rolex despite the fact that I could easily afford one. My money is a terrible thing to waste, and spending that much money just for a status symbol is not something that interests me at this point in my life.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE