The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Do I keep this, or send back?

I recently bought 1960s Omega Seamaster - automatic movement (552) and
stainless steel. From the outside it looks almost mint condition. The
crystal was even Omega signed. I paid £250 for it. The inside looked clean
enough when the back was open.

It was running two minutes slow and, following all the advice received here,
I decided to send it to Swiss Time Services, the UK Omega approved vintage
service agents to see what was wrong.

I got estimate today stating "Rebuild worn and corroded movement and replace
crown to make watertight - £380 plus VAT = £444.

I am now torn between sending it back to seller (who had offered a refund)
or getting the work done.

I really like the look and condition of the watch. It looks every bit as
good as a modern £1,500 Omega (eg Aqua terra) which I would buy if I could
afford it. I feel that if I send it back I will never find such a good
looking watch again.

On the other hand, £700 is a lot to have paid out for a 1960s watch. It
must be in a real mess (presumably water damaged). I don't know whether it
will ever be of original quality after such an extensive repair. And is it
likely to be worth anything like that amount after the work is complete?

In short, my heart wants to keep it, but my head say "no way". Any advice
would be much appreciated!

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE