The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Dear John and Joey
: Thanks a lot for your fast responses. Almost
: light-speed.
: Actually I am looking for a watch for the rest
: of my life (this might be my most important
: buying criterion). I wouldn't buy a watch
: which couldn't potentially serve me for the
: rest of my life: There are still at least 50
: years to go.
: Therefore: Both watches would take the
: challange, right? Is the quality of the
: movement, its durability, the qualitiy of
: material and alloys inside equal between
: both mentioned watches?
: Regards,
: Stephan
As long as you properly maintain your watch, making sure to have it serviced regularly, either watch should last a lifetime. I say "should" because we don't yet have enough long term data on the caliber 2500 to be sure. Its non-co-axial derivative (the 1120) has only been around for about 10 years, and the co-axial has only been around for 6 years. So, no one has owned one of these watches for a lifetime. The same goes for the current 3135 movement in the Explorer. It is true that the Rolex has a reputation for being a very durable movement. However, Omega's addition of the free sprung balance to caliber 2500 allows for greater shock/impact resistance. I think either movement will suit you well as long as you don't plan to engage in rough physical activities with it (which automatic watches aren't designed for anyway).
Rolex uses a higher grade of stainless steel in their watches, but this would only make a difference if you planned to dunk your watch in a vat of acid. Otherwise, for normal use, both materials will hold up just as well.
Any reputable watchmaker will tell you that either watch can last indefinitely as long as it is properly serviced. Any time your watch is serviced, worn or damaged parts will be replaced, so you don't have to worry about replacing an entire movement.
I know it's a difficult decision, so try them both on at your local AD and really get a feel for which one looks best on your wrist. In the end, you have to look at the watch everyday, so the movement becomes irrelevant if you simply don't like the looks of the watch. Good luck!!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |