The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Wonder why your wife said no to the Rolex.
The PO hasn't an inhouse movement, hasn't an automatic escape helium valve, triplock crown and isn't a profesional diving watch unlike the sea dweller which is the standard of deep sea diving watches since 1971. I am not also mentioning that the Rolex loses very few of its (resale) value.
The PO has some advantages on the Rolex however with a better clasp and better legibility due to larger hands.
When it comes to the movement, the Rolex wins hands down, can you compare a movement with 18 years of feedback with something new and with an unexisting feedback? Not me.
The PO is a dress diver but certainly not a professional tool watch unlike the Dweller which was a part of Comex operations from 1971 till 1998.
Of course all depends of your budget and what you like. The two best deep sea diving watches Omega ever made were the plo prof and the seamaster 1000.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |