The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

I Agree..

: Interesting post John, put what Omega has
: written about the coax just strenghten one
: of my feelings: that marketing can't be
: trusted because it can be misleading. I was
: always against marketing hype. The
: estimations Omega made about the Coax were
: wrong because all the tests concerning the
: Coax were laboratory tests.On the other hand
: Rolex mentions to service their watches
: every 5 years but yet some peopel have their
: 3135 still running superb. Lieing to
: customers decreases your reputation and make
: them go for looking a watch of another
: brand.
: Perhaps what Omega thought according to
: laboratory tests on the Coax was completely
: impossible to realize in normal wear
: conditions?
: John, now you understand why I don't like the
: way Omega is managed as well as many of its
: innovating products like the 33xx, 36xx who
: are sources of problems and who were
: declared as perfect according to the
: marketing hype.

: just my very honest thoughts

: regards

: georges

I readily admit that things like this do bother me, since it does damage Omega's credibility. If they weren't sure about the 10 year servicing claims, they should have kept their mouths shut until they had some real data.

Likewise, they have done an abysmal job of correcting the 33xx problems and communicating their findings (if any) to the customers. Instead, years later, we still have no idea exactly what defects were found and what Omega did to correct them. The fact that the same malfunctions are still occurring in some watches also indicates that the problems have not been fully corrected.

I love my Omega watches, but I will admit that I am less than pleased with the way they have handled the above issues.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE