The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: SMP2254.50 vs PlanetOcean2200.50. Whats your t

: I own a SMP2254.50 and I love it. But
: PlanetOcean 2200.50 do appeal to me with its
: new bezel, arrow-styled hands and co-xial
: escapement movement. I was thinking if I
: have not already bought the 2254.50, will I
: pay the premium to go with a PlanetOcean
: instead? What is your take? Will you pay the
: premium for the newer look and the co-axial
: technology?

: BTW, what is the different between co-axial and
: SMP2254's 1120 calibre?

Don't waste your money, go for the 1120. The Co-Ax is a rip-off, especially now that the service interval has been reduced from 10 to 5-7 years.(I'm still waiting for a public apology from Omega for lying to its customers)

I own 3 Seamasters, two 1120 driven and one 2500C driven.The former are just as accurate as the latter and I predict just as reliable as the Co-Ax will ever be.

In short: Go for the 1120, it is way more bang for your buck than the over priced and questionably superior Co-Ax.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE