The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Hi again,
I am wondering how accurate is reasonable to expect my seamaster chronograph to be after servicing. It is 11 years old now, and has never been a reliable timekeeper (always been slow, but I think a questionable service or two has been involved). I see posts of folks on various boards reporting getting their watches back and having them run +- 2 seconds a day, well better than chronometer standards, it seems to me. Do I just need to find a better watchmaker? Change my expectations? And what does "regulating" a watch really mean? Is that anything more complicated than the guy putting my watch on some sort of oscilloscope or whatever the amazing gadget is that he uses to tell whether the watch runs fast or slow? Thanks for anyone patient enough to educate the new guy!!!!
Thanks yet again,
Jimmy Penson
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |