![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Greetings, I’m a long time first time.
The problem I’m having is that even though some of these embarrassing gaffs may be able to be laid at the feet of say advertising or a related department other than R & D, the fact is, watch “mistakes” … err … design flaws are hitting the market. Wasn’t there a Seamaster with “Speedmaster” written/applied on the dial or vise versa?
So, is this a further example of Swatch’s ideal of commitment to accuracy and quality. We’ve already seen Omega’s problems with certain movements and increasing “misadventures” in U. S. servicing. On top of this, we have Swatch applying the proverbial thumbscrews to AD’s as they plan to take Omega further upscale? Does anyone see anything wrong with this picture?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |