zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Re: 1120 smp vs co-axial smp

In Response To: 1120 smp vs co-axial smp ()

: 1120 smp vs co-axial smp? that co-acial is more
: expensiv, is that more better?

In theory, yes. In reality, the co-axial hasn't been around long enough for us to say that it is more reliable or more accurate than the 1120. The co-axial escapement is designed to reduce friction, which (in theory) should give the watch better long term accuracy and allow the watch to go longer between servicings. My personal opinion is that the current 1120 Seamaster is a better bargain. Mine has been 100% reliable and has been very accurate for the past 4 years, so I wouldn't pay an extra $900 to upgrade to the co-axial at this point. This is just my opinion, though.

-John

Messages In This Thread

1120 smp vs co-axial smp

Re: 1120 smp vs co-axial smp

losing 5 sec.daily basis

Re: losing 5 sec.daily basis

thank you John.... *NM*

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

0 wallclock secs ( 0.18 usr + 0.02 sys = 0.20 CPU)