The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Although (as a former marketing professional) I've never bought into the notion that "any publicity is good publicity," I was pleased to see James Bond's Watches included among this review titled, "'Casino Royale' is riddled with “blatant” mistakes!"
After all, if there's gonna be 007 trivia, that trivia oughta include our stuff!
Funny thing is, I remember making notes to the first (at least insofar as I can recall) EON James Bond 007 film where the character wore two watches: "Thunderball." And not just issues w/ keeping scenes straight w/ using the Rolex (his "personal watch," I guess) versus the Breitling (his Q-issue "gadget watch," also the first-ever such modified by MI6, correct?).
Check out the diving scenes where mere camera angle shots show Mr. Connery with and without a watch, then back again.
But I digress. Let's get back to "Casino Royale" now....
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |