The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I've seen a few postings, both on this forum and on a 'Mistakes in Films' website, pointing out some continuity errors in Casino Royale specifically related to Bond's watch. In one scene for example, when he opens his laptop, he's wearing a Planet Ocean (I think), but by the time he's finished typing the email, he's wearing his Seamaster Pro.
Excluding the possibility that he just got bored of his PO mid-email and decided to switch to his SMP instead, do you think this was a deliberate ploy by Omega, knowing that the error would be picked up by lots of film geeks, leading to lots and lots of discussion and therefore free publicity for Omega?!
The more I think about it, the more I suspect some clever marketing dude at Omega snuck it in there on purpose!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |