![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Unconfirmed ..Omega to use Cal 8500 as base for... Posted By: Mathew J Date: 4/17/07 17:27 GMT all Omega automatic lines by 2010...read this on another forum and it was quoted from Watchtime, some interview with Stephen Urquhart. I can't confirm nor completely dispute this. I can point out some things though... So this is the first appearance outside of Bienne of the long awaited Split-Second variant. Three years behind schedule. So if this is correct, essentially in less than three years time, Omega plans on phasing out completely their ETA 2892 base caliber and replacing it with the 8500...seems like an aggressive goal (not unattainable though). It does seem like an ambitious goal, certainly an aggressive goal, however, it's attabinablity seems to be a stretch in my opinion based on past experience. I would only assume that this would mean massive price increases on the new models, as we have seen with the DeVille Hour vision vs. the standard Co Axial model...and also another redesign of their lineup. I would think that you are mostly correct on this point. I think it goes without saying that the Hour Vision powered watches would mean quite a hefty price bump over ETA, however, I wouldn't expect every Hour Vision model to have Sapphire Glass case sides and over time the cost of using that movement would decrease. I doubt they will ever be cost competitive with ETA movements though. I wonder if the new caliber will be able to drop into old cases without modification however I highly doubt it. I do not know. I'd like to think that Omega would have enough sense to not make their intergration into existing cases without much difficulty. But I don't like to try to place myself in the minds of those in charge as it's dark and dank, and the floors are wet and there are cobwebs all around and I keep bumping my head on the ceiling! And given the relative short time the ETA modified Co Axial was out on the market, Since 1999? That's what? 8 years? what future parts stores will be available for those pieces, granted one could swap the co axial mod for standard parts but who would want to do that. I really don't know. I'm a chronograph driver/owner/collector, not a chronograph doctor/mechanic. I also find it interesting that the DeVille is the vehicle that introduces major change...at least in the past two iterations with the Co Axial and now the 8500 caliber. I was really surprised that the original Co-Axial was a DeVille model, it's styling was far closer to a Connie Pie-Pan in my opinion. Really makes me want to pause before jumping into Omega since they appear to be at a crossroads. It's clear that Omega seems set on "climbing up the hill". If you look at Swatch Group's website sitemap, you'll find Omega listed not in the "High Grade" section of brands [Longines and Rado], but rather with the "Prestige" [highest] tier of Swatch Groups brands [along with Breguet, Blancpain, Glashütte Original, Jacquet Droz, Léon Hatot and Omega]. Personally, I don't consider Omega in the same breath as Breguet and Blancpain, but rather below them and above Rado (for sure) and Longines. |
| ||
|
| |
|
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |