| Informational Websites | ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox | OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website | Zowie -- Omega information |
| Discussion Forums | ChronoMaddox Forum | Heuer Forum | Omega Forum |
| Counterfeit Watchers | ChronoTools Forum | ChronoTrader Forum |
|
|
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
| For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
really the only major thing that I would like to see.
I know about the issues of accuracy in mechanical movements but I do think that the COSC level of tolerance is just not good enough for the year 2000.
I have a co-axial and it is near enough pefect as a timekeeper. I also have an SMP that is just not good enough, even after tweaking by Omega (nor is my Speedy Pro). Needless to say my X33 is faultless in this respect.
Once the (=my) basic purpose of having a watch is fulfilled I guess all I would want is more power reserve than 44 hours.
Finally a better Ti clasp might help. The current version is too prone to axial twisting.
| Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |