| Informational Websites | ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox | OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website | Zowie -- Omega information |
| Discussion Forums | ChronoMaddox Forum | Heuer Forum | Omega Forum |
| Counterfeit Watchers | ChronoTools Forum | ChronoTrader Forum |
|
|
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
| For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: The following Speedmaster on eBay has
: 145022-68ST on the case back, but a 321
: movement. I thought that this reference is
: supposed to have a 861. Do you think that
: this Speedmaster is legit? Thanks.
Hi Kelly!
This one looks more plausible than the other one…
http://cgi.ebay.com/Omega-Speedmaster-Vintage-Pre-Moon-from-the-60s-St-St_W0QQitemZ230202277966QQihZ013QQcategoryZ31387QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
At least this one has the right dial for a c.321. However, it has the 105.012 and early 145.012 chronograph second hand, the other main time keeping hands look fairly new, and the case back should be on a c.861, not an c.321.
Chances are that this one probably had it's back switched [accidentally] at some point during a service. While it's possible it left the factory that way, it has the elements for about three different watches. And that's before the very modern bracelet.
I'd personally pass, but if originality isn't your highest priority it may be a worthwhile purchase at the right price.
Buyer be aware!
-- Chuck
| Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |