![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
On the left we have a 1964 105.003
On the right a 1994 145.022
I don't think I need to say too much about these. I have found a period bezel for the 105.003 so the pulsations bezel is coming off. Although they are a very closely related, the watches are like "Chalk & Cheese" ( very different for the non-English speakers ). With the possible exception of the crystal, there isn't any common part on either watch.
Next we have the 1045 pair ...
These share the same movement & are pretty close agewise. I chose to put black day/date wheels on the righthand watch.
now we have a pair of Seamaster Cosmic 2000's
Again although very similar & of the same period, these watches share in fact nothing except the name on the dial. Complete different cases. bracelets, movements etc
Here's my favourite pairing ..... the flightmaster brothers ( Orville & Wilbur ? )
On the left we have the 910 version with it's 24 indicator & shallower case, domed crystal.
On the right is the 911 version with its constant second hand, taller case & flat crystal.
- My favourite Omegas !
& finally .....
Big Daddy & his granddaughter ...
On the left is the only ladies pilot-line cased watch I have ever seen & on the right the speedy MK III. ( I could also have shown the SM 120 Chrono here, which is argueably bigger & heavier )
Funnily enough, when I was wondering what to post here, I couldn't think of many pairings .... then I open up the watch box & in the end I decided to limit myself to what I showed above.
As you can see I stuck to Omega pairings, but a Seiko Bellmatic & Omega Memomatic was an option as was a Titus f300 diver & Omega f300 diver.
It's a good thread Jeff.
Next time lets do opposites !
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |