The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I posted the following message on the Rolex
: forum but this is certainly applicable to
: Omega too. Any thoughts? This is not
: necessarily a question specific to Rolex,
: but since I'm here I'll ask. I have read
: many posts from folks complaining about the
: accuracy of their certified chronometer,
: gains 10 seconds, looses 12 etc, and the
: advice that is usually given, assuming it's
: a new watch, is to give it some
: "time" to break in or get settled
: or whatever it needs. If it needs this
: additional time to "break in",
: then how did it get this certified rating in
: the first place. If it was running within
: the acceptable specs. when it was tested,
: should it not be running the same way when
: the watch is purchased?
:
: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |