The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: ...have neither soul, personality, nor history.
: But get whatever will make you the
: happiest.
If you are looking for extreme accuracy, less maintenance and a less expensive watch, quartz wins hands down. If you prefer older technology, high maintenance costs and wish to please your watchmaker every four to five years with expensive ($200+) overhauls get auto. I speak from personal experience since I own both types. None of my 10 to 12 quartz watches have ever had a repair and one of them goes back to 1972. One of my autos that also goes back to 1972 has been to the watch repairman five or six times for overhauls. It is still my favorite watch because I am emotionally attached to it due to its appearance. Nevertheless, I wish it had a quartz movement. I would have saved a lot of money on overhauls.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |