The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
It sounds like you are looking for a quick and simple way to tell which is better. But do not be so desperate for an easy answer that you accept a bad or misleading solution to your problem.
When dealing with VINTAGE anything--especially mechanical devices--you really cannot shortcut the process. You HAVE to evaluate the individual vintage pieces based on their current condition and recently measured performance.
There is little importance to how well a vintage watch was adjusted when it left the factory. That was 40 years ago! A lot will have happened to the watch in 40 years that will effect its current performance.
The number of jewels is also a red herring. The reason some older models are more desirable are for any of a number of attributes BESIDES the number of jewels.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |