The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
What mainly contributed to the Speedy's remarkable performance in the NASA tests?
1)The choice of the cal 321 (cal. 861 in the tests) for the Speedy movement. (if so, do other watches equipped with the same Lemania mov't share similar durability?)
2)The relatively poor performance of other watches in the test? Some of the brands were famous like Rolex, but others were considerably less well-known/respected.
3)The workmanship/craftmanship of the Omega factory in building the Speedy.
4) Some other design aspect of the Speedy (e.g. Hesalite crystal, case integrity etc?)
Also, do you believe such tests would be difficult for today's modern automatic mechanical water-resistant chronographs to pass?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |