The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Yesterday, I was at my parent's house going through some of my stuff in storage there. (So I am 40 years old and still have stuff in my parents attic...doesn't everybody?)
While I was doing it I hooked up the 1961 McIntosh receiver I inherited from an uncle to dad's pair of 1959 Jensen floor speakers to listen to music. Found three of my grandfathers old pocket watches (all were the cheapest dime store models available, but priceless to me). Wound them up and they ran fine. Found dad's 1950's Comptometer (non-printing adding machine) and my other grandfather's 1910 typewriter, they worked flawlessly too. The two pieces that didn't fully work were a 1920's radio (just made a hum) and a wire recorder which ran, but made no sound (probably both have a tube out).
While enjoying all this *old* technology that mostly still worked beautifully, I threw out several deceased quartz watches, some solid state stereo equipment that was solid defunct, and some *ancient* computer parts that were almost 5 years old and totally useless.
What's wrong with this picture? Why were all the "new and improved" devices that were 5 to 15 years old now useless and going into the trash while most of the 40+ year old devices were still going?
I enjoy quartz watches for their merits of convenience and accuracy...but this sure reminds me why I prefer to keep mechanicals as my 'better' watches. I know which I will still be enjoying another 40 years in the future!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |