The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
The Explorer 1 has a little more history, cachet, and desireability. Like the Speedy moonwatch, it holds some historical significance in horology. First watch to climb Mt Everest. Worn in one of the most grueling Antartica expeditions. It was also the first milestone sports SS chronometer in the early part of the 1950s. It also has Rolexes' patented twinlock crown mechanism.
The Seamaster 120, historically, was always a younger sibling to the Seamaster 300 and now the professional. Hence, it always has been overshadowed as the poormans' diver's Seamaster. They tried to gloss it over by using Jaque Mayol to push the line in the early 80s. However, despite this, he wears the SMP Pro. The Explorer 1 has no equal in the Rolex line. It stands alone because of its hallmark significance. Very much like the Speedy Pro. Both watches have been undilluted and been faithful to their followers. Like the Speedy, entire books have been written about the Explorer. It has a cult following.
A 40 year old Explorer 6610 fetches for roughly around $4,000 USD.Prices have increased by 5% annually. A 1965 Seamaster 120 fetches for around $300.
Sure resale is not important but I think the Seamaster 120 is more of a dress watch than a sports watch. If thats what you like then fine.
I don't know about the SM120 but the explorer looks equally attractive on a bracelet, leather strap, and a NATO strap. On the bad side, Walt Oldets didn't like it too much so he wrote a very disparaging article on it.
-
H Doan
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |