![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Congrats on your purchase! I get what you mean about going for the 'ground-up' co-axial calibre but the co-axial ETA ebauch movement is still a thing of beauty. If you want state-of-the-art timekeeping, get a caesium fountain clock, not a mechanical timepiece! I agonised over the 2503 or -04. In the end I went for the 36mm because I don't have particularly big wrists and the 39mm looked a little oversized on me (and my 1991 Longines Conquest is only 31mm so I'm used to a small watch). Having said that, I think the 39mm dial looks marginally less 'crowded' than the 36.
You think you love it now; just wait a few months until you've seen it in the full range of light (and dark - the black dial is B-L-A-C-K). You won't be able to stop looking at it. You'll always know the time and your only excuse for being late will be, "I couldn't stop looking at my watch!"
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |