:
Well... Some consider it a Constellation:
:
:
http://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.com/2009/03/rare-14311-globemaster-surfaces.html
I was aware of Desmond's article -- however, it can't be a Constellation until Constellations existed, now can it? You are claiming a watch from 1950 was a Constellation, when the collection didn't exist yet. Now, if you wished to say it was a watch with a similar face and case style as were later used in a Constellation, or adjust the claimed date to a later one; that may be possible.
But even that was not the case (number!?), if I recall correctly, without reconsulting the article. Early Constellations had 4 digit case references, not a 5 digit case references, which did not appear until the mid to late 1950s in ANY Omega watches.
While the history of the early US, "non-Constellation" Constellations is a murky one, to call something Norman Morris may have put together to sell in the US before Omega decided to have a Constellation model at all is revisionist history at best.