The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: New watch
In Response To: Re: New watch ()

Here is a caption from this article:
"The two rarest cases in the early ‘bumper’ series of Constellations are OT 2737 and OT 14.311. The combination of a 1951 batch calibre 352 RG with an OT 143.11 case indicates one of the earliest Constellations to appear on the market. The stamping of OXG on the balance cock verifies that this particular 14.311 was earmarked for the United states, and therefore confirms that the Constellation lettering would not be present because of trademark restrictions. "

Best regards.

: I was aware of Desmond's article -- however, it can't be a
: Constellation until Constellations existed, now can it? You are
: claiming a watch from 1950 was a Constellation, when the
: collection didn't exist yet. Now, if you wished to say it was a
: watch with a similar face and case style as were later used in a
: Constellation, or adjust the claimed date to a later one; that
: may be possible.

: But even that was not the case (number!?), if I recall correctly,
: without reconsulting the article. Early Constellations had 4
: digit case references, not a 5 digit case references, which did
: not appear until the mid to late 1950s in ANY Omega watches.

: While the history of the early US, "non-Constellation"
: Constellations is a murky one, to call something Norman Morris
: may have put together to sell in the US before Omega decided to
: have a Constellation model at all is revisionist history at
: best.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE