The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Actually, since we haven't seen pictures of it we can't be sure its a different clasp.
Did this gentleman buy the watch second hand? If so, its possible that the previous owner may have filed down that razor sharp flange.
As you know, the sharp edge of the flange protrudes when the extension is open as it is on a diving suit. I frankly think as a divers extension its potentially dangerous and poorly designed. The sharp edge could catch on to and rip almost anything soft.
I could definitely see someone filing it smooth.
Mark
: Right. But we are talking about one with a
: *slightly* different clasp--at least where
: the diver's extension hinges shut.
: This one is apparently lacking the flange that
: appears on the one shown here at
: Chronocentric *and* on the one in Mr.
: Ramsey's review.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |