The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: 3) diving bezel
: - I see no difference between both, this is a
: pure taste thing, otherwise explain to me
: technically a real benefit of either one. I
: like the SM hard clicks alot.
I think you covered most of it except I disagree with this point. I had a Bond Seamaster and now the black one. Both bezels did not have an easy grip (especially with wet hands) compared to a Rolex 'saw' tooth type bezels. The bezels on the Omegas are much harder to turn than the Rolexes.
I don't think the sword hands would work in a chronograph for legibility reasons. It would cover the sub dials.
-
H Doan
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |