The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: far more accurate. I can only assume that
: the price difference is due to the cost of
: battery replacement that is needed with the
: quartz model, so before I take the decision
Bad assumption.
The majority of the price difference between the automatic and quartz versions are market pricing. That makes the automatics a little more exclusive. The actual cost of the movements and replacement parts like batteries are completely nominal in terms of the final street price of the watches.
Same way a Rolex costs twice what an Omega does--despite not being appreciably different in quality or manufacture. Or why a solid gold Omega costs $5,000 to 13,000 more than the identical steel one does--despite containing only $300-900 worth of gold.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |