The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
A correctly used ultrasonic cleaning method involves no abrasives at all. To suggest the use of abrasives is to completely misunderstand the ultrasonic cleaning process. Objects are cleaned by the action of cavitation which produces areas of negative pressure or vacuum adjacent to the object. These "micro-vacuums" remove the dirt. The solution might include emulsifiers or solvents to hold the dirt but certainly do not need abrasives. The vibratory nature of the sound wave could cause an abrasive to work but this is not the intent. An ultrasonic device is not a microtumbler. The fluids best used in an ultrasonic cleaner are those which most easily cavitate. Almost anything can be cleaned in such a cleaner, including metal watch bands, if the correct fluid is used. In fact, I don't know of a more thorough or better method. He who tells you otherwise is simply ignorant of the process.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |