The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
In any case, true watch enthusiasts regard Auto watches of having higher horological value than Quartzes. Of course, this is from a general standpoint.
Personally, I use both types. My SMP auto is +10.5 secs in three WEEKS now, which is about +0.35 secs/day. As good as a low or mid level Quartz watch, which is not bad for a purely mechanical watch.
On the other hand, positional performance DOES NOT strictly depend on wearing the watch. Usually, serious watch enthusiasts also like to have a watch winder, which allows to keep the watch alive for several months, and also keep overall precision.
For "chronographing" purposes, nothing seems to be better than a nice LCD display with easy to read and accurate numbers. That is where I think Quartz machines shine. But for hour-telling purposes alone, it is always going to be a life-long debate.
Enojoyed your post,
Ferenc
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |