The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
It might be interesting to note that portable timepieces have been manufactured with aaccuracies much better than what you are talking about without a reference standard. Just one example: in 1934 the firm of Dent in London built a chronometer with a measured rate error of under one second per year. Standards for marine chronometers are more stringent than those for "superlative chronometer" which is found emblazoned on the dials of some watches. These watches do not have a chronometer escapement which is the most accurate mechanical one. If you are using a watch as a timepiece and wish it to be accurate, why not just buy one of the watches that are radio-synchronized to a national standard and be done with it.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |