The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I've occasionally read posts arguing quartz vs auto', in which posters claimed that the advantage of auto' watches over quartz is mainly by their ability of lasting for lifetime.
I'm wondering why can't quartz watches lasting for lifetime, after all their mechanical systems are much less complicated than those in the auto's and the electronic systems have never been something to worry about anyway. In addition, there is also a broad consensus that quartz watches are more shock resistant than autos... so what is the catch here? Why can't quartz watches last for lifetime?
I don't intend to open a new "auto vs quartz" thread here but only curious about this specific point.
Thanks for any input.
Baruch.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |