The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: last year.
I have one and they are great watches. The movement is very similar to the one used in the SMP...it's an earlier non-chrono version, but still using the same ETA 2892-A2 base movement. The only real difference was some minor changes to the winding mechanism. My Dynamic is the most acccurate of my mechanical watches, including 3 I had that were COSC, running between +1 and +2/day.
'Tis a shame Mr. Bond wasn't an RAF pilot, or THEY would be the talked about watch.
...in the product line?I hear LOTS here about
: the SMPs,but little about the Dynamics?I'm
: specificly reffering to the regular
: time/date version.
: Are they any good?Is the mov'nt the same as an
: SMP?
: Are these watches thought of as
: "boring" or just too plain?
: Any thoughts from owners would be great.
: Regards,
: Mikey
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |